Visit the ACCC COVID-19 Resource Center & Discussion Group for Insights on Providing Optimal Patient Care During the Pandemic.
 

Share

    


In This Section

Home / Learn / Patient-Centered Care / Distress Screening

Distress Screening

In 2008, the Institute of Medicine (now the National Academies of Science, Medicine, and Engineering) released its influential  report, Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs, which called attention to the importance of the psychosocial needs of cancer patients and the consequences of these needs remaining unmet. The IOM report concludes:

Attending to psychosocial needs should be an integral part of quality cancer care. All components of the health care system that are involved in cancer care should explicitly incorporate attention to psychosocial needs.

Today, there is an increasing body of knowledge around this area, and organizations like the Commission on Cancer (CoC) and others are including distress screening as part of their guidelines and accreditation standards.

Featured Program

Psychosocial Distress Screening—Model Sites

ACCC, along with its project partner APOS, identified three ACCC member programs that are serving as model sites for the “Psychosocial Distress Screening” project.
Learn More

Geriatric Assessment: One Size Does Not Fit All


May 16, 2019
icon-leave-a-comment

Spoiler Alert: If you missed this week’s ACCC webinar on “A Review of Validated Tools for Geriatric Assessment and How to Use Them,” this blog post starts with the bottom line takeaway.

Presenter Tanya M. Wildes, MD, cut to the chase in concluding Monday’s webinar: “Let’s agree to stop saying that it [geriatric assessment] is time-consuming!”

Contrary to popular belief, she said, assessments for elderly patients with cancer, do not consume much of a provider’s time. Feasibility studies indicate that an abbreviated geriatric assessment takes about 20 to 25 minutes, of which only 4 to 6 minutes require a provider’s time. Those few minutes are time well-spent, said Dr. Wildes, considering the excessive time providers may have to spend on managing adverse events for older patients who would have responded better to a treatment plan modified for their specific needs. Dr. Wildes is Associate Professor of Medicine at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri. During the May 13 webinar, she reviewed the development, validation, and utility of the most commonly used geriatric assessment tools.

For the webinar, Dr. Wildes described the differences between geriatric screening tools and geriatric assessments. Both can be used to improve care for senior adult patients. Screening tools can be used to determine whether a patient should be referred for further evaluation; geriatric assessment tools can be used to capture a more comprehensive view of the elderly patient across multiple domains both to refer for needed support services and to determine a patient’s risk for specific negative outcomes.

For elderly patients with cancer, a comprehensive geriatric assessment (GCA) takes into account a series of patient-specific variables—including cognition, function, communication, comorbidities, medications (polypharmacy), social support (both environmental and socioeconomic)—together with toxicity risk calculator tools—to arrive at a risk prediction for potential negative treatment outcomes such as chemotherapy toxicity and early mortality. With this information, said Dr. Wildes, oncologists can more effectively modify cancer treatments and the care team can better understand and address the patient’s supportive care needs.

Dr. Wilde discussed some of the most commonly used validated assessment tools and reviewed current research on their efficacy. Among the most frequently utilized are the CARG Chemo Toxicity Calculator (from the Cancer and Aging Research Group), the CRASH Score Calculator (Chemotherapy Risk Assessment for High Age Patients from the Moffitt Cancer Center), and ePprognosis, an online tool from the University of California San Francisco. Each of these assessments, noted Dr. Wildes, have their respective strengths and weaknesses. Visit the ACCC website for a comprehensive list of geriatric oncology screening and assessment tools and resources.

To address the utility of assessments, Dr. Wildes reviewed a series of published studies that have evaluated the extent to which oncologists modify individual treatment regimens in response to the results of geriatric patient assessments. Among the findings is evidence that providing an oncologist with the results of a senior adult patient’s assessment increases modifications for age-related concerns and improves patient satisfaction with provider communication.

If you missed Dr. Wildes’ webinar or any webinars in ACCC’s series on multidisciplinary approaches to caring for geriatric patients with cancer, you can view them on demand. Join us for the next webinar in the series—Empowering the Multidisciplinary Team to Support Care for Geriatric Oncology Patients—on Tuesday, May 21. All webinars require registration and are free of charge.

 

From Oncology Issues

  •  Young Adult Parents Tap into Long Distance Support
    Laura Melton, PhD, ABPP
    We proposed creating an online video support group to enable patients with cancer who would otherwise have difficulty attending such groups to participate virtually.
  •  Implementing Oncology Distress Screening in a Large Academic Health System
    Marianne Pearson, LCSW, AND Laura M. Melton, PhD
    A step-by-step guide on how to develop and implement a health system-wide distress screening tool.
  •  Geriatric Assessment, Multidisciplinary Model is Focus of FITNESS Study in Older Adults
    Amy Hindman
    The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute’s Cancer and Aging Resilience (CARE) Clinic goes beyond reviewing cancer-specific treatment. This new care model pairs patients with a multidisciplinary team to assess patients for balance, cognition, nutrition, symptom management, and many more—all in one visit.
  • Supportive Care Just When Patients Need It
    By Tina Curtis, DNP, MBA, RN, NEA-BC, and Elizabeth Malosh, MSN, RN, NE-BC
    For patients with cancer experiencing symptoms outside of business hours or when same-day appointments are unavailable, the usual options are to wait until the next day or visit the emergency department (ED). However, ED visits come with clinical and financial risks for oncology patients. Read how The Clinical Cancer Center at Froedtert Hospital developed a 24-hour urgent care oncology clinic to reduce ED use, eliminate redundant services, and alleviate financial burden.
  • A Physician Champion Takes a Practice-Based Immunotherapy Program to the Next Level
    Tracy Virgilio, RN, MSN, OCN
    Early symptom management is key to improving quality of life for patients with cancer, and proactive monitoring delivers unparalleled survival advantage while decreasing emergency visits and admissions. However, immunotherapies require special attention and procedures. Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center earned a 2018 ACCC Innovator Award for their immunotherapy triage algorithms, which provide non-oncology physicians and nurses with the tools to manage IO patients and prevent unnecessary admissions.
  •  Technology Unlocks Untapped Potential in a Financial Navigation Program
    By Clara Lambert, BBA, OPN-CG; Scott Legleitner, BA, LPhT, SST; and Kathleen LaRaia
    While financial navigation programs ease the burden of financial toxicity on patients with cancer and help healthcare organizations with revenue loss, the manual nature of the process is challenging for navigators and financial advocates. Cowell Family Cancer Center piloted a financial navigation software program to analyze the effects of automation on productivity, workflow, and organizational alignment.
  •  Community-Based Psychological First Aid for Oncology Professionals
    By Sam Gaster, MA; Christina Early, MSW; Amanda Reed, PhD; and Brandon Gray, MA
    Training in community-based psychological first aid is a promising intervention that promotes adaptive functioning by instilling individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to support oneself and others when stressful events occur. The Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, S.D., has conducted community-based psychological first aid for its workforce since August 2017.
  •  Views: The Trauma of Cancer
    By Kelly Grosklags, LICSW, BCD
    I have worked with oncology patients in some capacity for 25 years, but hearing “posttraumatic stress disorder” (PTSD) and “cancer” in the same sentence is a relatively new concept for most.
  •  Patient Care Connect
    By Warren Smedley, MSHA, MSHQS, and Gabrielle B. Rocque, MD
    Though the concept of patient navigation is not new, the use of lay navigation teams across the continuum of a cancer journey is a novel approach to care coordination. Integrating lay navigators into the healthcare team empowers the clinical team to work at a higher level within the scope of their training.
  •  Beyond the Classroom: Students Improve Access to Supportive Care Services
    By Bridget LeGrazie, APN; Brie Bernhardt, MSW, LSW; and Lisa Rosenberry, MS, MSW, LCSW, OSW-C
    In 2016 Virtua Cancer Program saw approximately 2,400 analytic cases across three ncampuses. Our two full-time (FTE) social workers were challenged to meet this high patient demand, and it soon became clear that improvements were needed
  •  Geriatric Oncology Ambulatory Care Clinics
    By Janine Overcash; Sandra Abels; H. Paige Erdeljac; Susan Fugett; Brittany Knauss; Elizabeth Kress; Cari Utendorf; and Anne M. Noonan
    The role of the geriatric oncology ambulatory care clinic is important to the care of the older person in that it assembles a multidisciplinary team of oncology professionals specialized in aging and who work together to conduct comprehensive geriatric assessment and develop a cancer management plan.
  •  Life with Cancer at Inova Schar Cancer Institute
    By Sage Bolte, PhD, MSW, OSW-C
    Learn how Inova Schar Cancer Institute’s Life with Cancer program, with more than 40 multidisciplinary staff members, comes together to offer psychosocial support and survivorship care.
  • Oncology Distress Screening: Distress prevalance, new standards, implementation
    Kendall J, et al.
    Oncology Distress Screening: Distress prevalance, new standards, implementation
  •  Growing a Psychosocial Oncology Program within a Cancer Center
    Hamann HA and Kendall J.
    Growing a Psychosocial Oncology Program within a Cancer Center
  •  Catalyzing Patient-Centered Care—Start Where You Are and Share What You Know
    Pratt-Chapman, et al.
    Catalyzing Patient-Centered Care
  •  Distress Screening for Oncology Patients
    Buxton D, et al.
    Distress Screening for Oncology Patients
  •  Bridging the Psychosocial and Financial: A Model for Decreasing Patient Distress, While Ensuring Your Program’s Financial Viability.
    Bridging the Psychosocial and Financial
  •  From Distress Screenings to Solutions
    Lori McMullen, RN, MSN, OCN
    At the Edward and Marie Matthews Center for Cancer Care, Plainsboro, N.J., the process for developing and implementing psychosocial distress screening began in January 2013.
  •  A Cognitive Approach to Cancer Treatment
    Marlena Ryba, PhD
    Too often, the emotional burdens accompanying cancer lead to early withdrawal from chemotherapy, for example, and poor outcomes. However, a series of clinical studies suggest psychotherapy can counter those effects, with powerful implications for patients.
  •  Building a Navigation and Psychosocial Support Program from the Ground Up
    Lori McNulty, RN, and Faye Flemming, RN, BSN, OCN
    At ACCC member Southside Regional Medical Center, an oncology nurse navigator heads up navigation and psychosocial services, including partnering with a local community agency to help meet high referral and patient demand.