The Road to Recovery Report makes specific recommendations for maintaining the adaptations made necessary to accommodate the disruptions caused by the pandemic. Where possible, the report recommends building on that momentum to spur much-needed change in cancer care and research.
In December 2020, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) published the Road to Recovery Report: Learning From the COVID-19 Experience to Improve Clinical Research and Cancer Care. The report created a roadmap for how to apply the lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic to create positive change in cancer care delivery and research. The effort was guided by the ASCO Steering Group on Cancer Care Delivery and Research in a Post-Pandemic Environment, which is comprised of two multidisciplinary tasks forces: the Cancer Care Delivery Task Force and the Research Task Force. The Road to Recovery Report makes specific recommendations for maintaining the adaptations made necessary to accommodate the disruptions caused by the pandemic. Where possible, the report recommends building on that momentum to spur much-needed change in cancer care and research.
The report’s recommendations for clinical research focus on five goals that aim to support the drive toward a “more equitable, accessible, and efficient clinical research system that protects patient safety, ensures scientific integrity, and maintains data quality.” These goals aim to:
Table 1 of the report provides more detail on each goal, along with action steps for achieving them.
In March 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued Emergency Guidance to enable clinical trials to continue within the constraints made necessary by COVID-19. These flexibilities enabled aspects of the clinical research enterprise to carry on while also keeping patients and research teams safe. The flexibilities included:
Although ASCO and other organizations have long advocated for these changes, overcoming systemic resistance to changing established procedures and processes has been difficult. ASCO’s Road to Recovery report is a call to continue the momentum for change stimulated by COVID-19 beyond the pandemic. It advocates for retaining the process modifications that have served patients, providers, regulators, and sponsors well by addressing inefficiencies, access barriers, costliness, and disparities in cancer clinical research.
ASCO complemented the Road to Recovery with a research statement, Recommendations to Streamline and Standardize Clinical Trial Site Feasibility Assessments (FAs). The statement critiques current clinical research standards as “costly, inconsistent, inefficient, labor intensive, and of uncertain effectiveness.” In brief, ASCO believes that the current FA process impedes timely access to studies and delays advancements in safe and effective novel therapies. To address this, ASCO recommends that all trial sponsors and contract research organizations implement a streamlined, uniform feasibility assessment process. To do so, ASCO proposes that the FA process be completed in one of three ways:
ASCO’s additional recommendations to streamline the FA process include:
For the feasibility questionnaire, ASCO recommends reducing redundancy and variation across sponsors and CROs and, where possible, standardizing the assessment questions to include:
These FA recommendations reflect the work of an ASCO task force that was informed by feedback from multiple stakeholders, including trials sites, biotech-pharma sponsors, and CROs. “All stakeholders stand to benefit from implementing these recommendations to improve site FAs for clinical trials,” the report’s authors summarize. “Standardizing and centralizing the FA process will expedite trial start-up, allow sites to devote more time and attention to trial implementation, and enable more sites and patients to have access to high-quality oncology clinical trials.”
This blog post is adapted from an article that previously appeared in ACCC’s Research Review newsletter. Read back issues of the newsletter and learn more about the role of clinical trials in cancer programs and practices.
At the 2026 ASCO Annual Meeting, the Louisiana Oncology Society received the ASCO Jeffrey C Ward Affiliate Advocacy Award for advancing critical advocacy priorities that have translated into meaningful legislative victories. The Iowa Oncology Society and Washington State Medical Oncology Society were also recognized for their advocacy efforts in 2025 at the meeting, receiving second place awards.
