![]() |
||
| www.nos-nevada.com Spring 2008 | ||
|
A Preview of 2008 First, I would like to say Happy New Year to all members of the NOS and their staffs. I would also like to thank the membership of the NOS for allowing me to serve my second term as President of the Society. Our goals for the upcoming year are to continue to broaden the membership and participation in the NOS as well as facilitate the communication and interaction of the academic and clinical practitioners of oncology in Nevada. The Board of Directors of NOS has decided to change the format of the semi-annual meetings from Saturday venues (with historically light participation) to evening dinner meetings in a Las Vegas or Reno restaurant. We hope that the times will be more convenient and the concentrated programs more stimulating to the membership. Our first meeting in Southern Nevada is scheduled for March 27 at Lawry’s The Prime Rib from 5:30 pm - 8:30 pm. We are pleased to have a focus on head and neck cancer with guest speaker Dr. Robert Wang of the University of Nevada School of Medicine Department of Otolaryngology. His presentation will be followed by an informal multidisciplinary panel discussion on the same subject. Our corporate members also will be present to discuss their newest products. I hope to see all of you there to kick off this new forum. Of course, we welcome other suggestions for future meetings. To register for the meeting, click here. |
||||||||||||||||||
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) continue to collect data related to oncology services to determine appropriate payment rates in private practices and in hospital outpatient departments. The proposed -10.1 percent cut in physician services was reversed by Congress, giving physicians a temporary 0.5 percent increase in the conversion factor to $38.087 through June 30. The payment rate will revert back to the original -10.1 as of July 1, 2008 if further action is not taken. New Infusion Codes. Effective January 2008, three new codes have been added for therapeutic and prophylaxis infusion. These codes are as follows:
Revised Codes: 90760 – IV infusion hydration, initial hour now requires at least 31 minutes. Documentation of start and stop times becomes even more important in determining whether it is correct to use this code. If the infusion for hydration is less than 31 minutes, you are required to use the injection code. Modifiers. Three new modifiers are now required when reporting claims for erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA’s) J0881, darbepoetin alfa, 1 mcg, and J0885, epoetin alfa, 1000 units: 1) EA-ESA, anemia, chemo-induced; 2) EB-ESA, anemia, radio-induced; and 3) EC-ESA, anemia, non-chemo/radio induced. In addition to the modifiers, all claims require reporting of either the most recent hematocrit or hemoglobin levels. Two additional modifier changes relate to clinical trials: Q0 – Replaces QA and QR for investigational clinical services provides during a research study; Q1 – Replaces the QV modifier for routine items or services provided in a Medicare Qualifying clinical trial on facility claims.
For 2008 in the practice setting, reimbursement for pharmaceuticals remains at the Average Sales Price (ASP) +6 percent. Click here to view a table (from the upcoming March/April 2008 Oncology Issues) that demonstrates drug reimbursement for the first quarter of 2008 in the private practice setting, the current hospital outpatient department at ASP +5 percent, and the proposed ASP +3 percent for hospitals in 2009. Hospital outpatient department reimbursement was reduced to ASP +5 percent for 2008. CMS has proposed to use 2008 as a transition year for hospital outpatient departments and will initiate ASP +3 percent in 2009. For 2008, the hospital outpatient department packaging threshold for drugs not paid separately was raised to $60. Medicare continues to reimburse pre-administration services for IVIG using code G0332. In addition, anti-emetics are reimbursed separately and exempt from the hospital outpatient packaging rule.
Section 911 of the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003 requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to integrate the administration of Medicare Parts A and B fee-for-service benefits into Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) jurisdictions. The contracting reform is aimed at integrating the work performed by Medicare Part A fiscal intermediaries and Part B carriers, so that each regional MAC will adjudicate all fee-for-service claims that come from Part A and Part B. The agency plans to award 15 A/B MACs by 2009. The transition from Medicare Part A fiscal intermediaries and Part B carriers to MACs began more than two years ago. In July 2006, CMS awarded the Jurisdiction 3 (J3) A/B MAC contract to Noridian Administrative Services. The J3 MAC is now fully implemented and operational, and in its first months of operation the transition appears to be going smoothly. Click here to view a national map of the A/B MACs by state. Nevada is in Region 1. The status of MAC contracts under Cycle One of the roll out is as follows:
To summarize, at this time five MAC contracts have been awarded: J1, J3, J4, J5, and J12, and two awards have been protested: J1 and J12. The Cycle Two MAC roll out starting in 2008 will include seven MAC A/B jurisdictions: J6, J8, J9, J10, J14, and J15. CACs' Role Remains. MACs will continue to use the Carrier Advisory Committees (CACs) unless or until there is a change to the Program Integrity Manual (PIM). To date, the three MAC contractors that have implemented services are not planning to change the CAC process, and these three have kept in place a CAC from each state. What has changed is representation; to date, each MAC has opted to have one medical director, rather than one medical director for each state within the MAC’s jurisdiction. Note: The implementation of regional MACs will result in the consolidation of local coverage determinations (LCDs). Having input into that final LCD is an important issue as this transition process continues and states begin to use regional decisions. Ongoing communication individually and between the CACs and MACs will be vital in the ongoing transition process and for consistency in the future. Questions? Contact Marci Cali, Executive Director, Oncology State Society Network at 301.984.9496, ext. 238 or email: mcali.ossn@accc-cancer.org.
Click here to view YOUR county's trend on the National Cancer Institute's State of Nevada page. Nevada has more than 11,000 individuals diagnosed with cancer each year, and 4,600 more dying from the disease, Click here to see which states have even higher cancer incidence rates.
For specific information about Nevada's comprehensive cancer control plan, click here. (This is a large file and may take a few seconds to download.) As a member of the local and state-wide oncology community, the specifics of your state’s plan for dealing with comprehensive cancer control are of particular importance. Defined by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) as “a collaborative process through which a community and its partners pool resources to reduce the burden of cancer,” the specifics of a state’s comprehensive cancer control program are spelled out in state plans. All 50 states have such plans that describe the strategic actions a state is taking to address the prevention and treatment of cancer. For further information about state comprehensive cancer control measures, click here to read an Oncology Issues article by Leslie S. Given and Karin Hohman.
The Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) will present its 34th Annual National Meeting at the Baltimore Marriott Waterfront Hotel in Baltimore, Md., on April 2-5, 2008. ACCC's Annual Meeting is the perfect opportunity for your entire cancer care team (physicians, nurses, administrators, and billers/coders) to strengthen their skills and network with their colleagues. Learn about Medicare rule changes, physician/hospital alignment, contract negotiation, compendia changes, quality improvement...and much more. ACCC's Annual National Meeting offers practice tracks with hands-on and timely information to help your practice and the entire multidisciplinary cancer team.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) asked the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to study the delivery of psychosocial services to cancer patients and their families and identify ways to improve it. The IOM defined psychosocial health services ias: "psychological and social services and interventions that enable patients, their families, and health care providers to optimize biomedical health care and to manage the psychological/behavioral and social aspects of illness and its consequences so as to promote better health." In its October 2007 report, the IOM examines the inclusion of psychosocial services as appropriate cancer care. The report is entitled: Report Brief, October 2007, “Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs.” The IOM report concludes that all cancer care should ensure the provision of appropriate psychosocial health services by: 1) facilitating effective communication between patients and care providers; 2) identifying each patient’s psychosocial health needs; and 3) designing and implementing a plan that: links the patient with needed psychosocial services, coordinates biomedical and psychosocial care, engages and supports patients in managing their illness and health, and systematically follows up on reevaluating and adjusting plans. |
|
Copyright 2008 Association of Community Cancer Centers. All Rights Reserved |