ACCC Submits Comments to CMS on HOPPS Final Rule

  ACCC's Drug Database and Compendia-Based Drug Bulletin Put on Hold

  FDA Approves New Indication for Gleevec

  FDA Approves Genzyme's Mozobil

  ACCC's 4th Annual Hospital Summit Highlights Trends in Cancer Care

  ACCC Final Rule Analysis Conference Call Available on Website

  CMS Clarifies Requirements for Physician Supervision of HOPD Therapeutic Services

  ACCC Analysis: Final 2009 OPPS Rule, Payment for Some Chemo Administration Services Increases, Others Decline

  ACCC Analysis: Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule for 2009, Payments for Drug Administration Services Reduced

  CMS Postpones RAC Program

  ACCC's Drug Bulletin on Hold Until 2009

  FDA Approves Treanda to Treat Patients with Relapsed Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

  CMS Releases Final 2009 Hospital Outpatient Department Rule, ASP +4 Percent

  CMS Releases Final 2009 Changes to Payment Policies and Rates Under Medicare Physician Fee Schedule

  CMS Releases Guidance on Use of Drug Compendia

Morphine in Cancer Pain: Multiple Uses and Misconceptions about Addiction
by Debra B. Gordon R.N., M.S.

Oncology Issues, July/August 2003, Volume 18, Number 4

Morphine has long been considered the gold standard for the treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain. Named after Morpheus, the Greek god of dreams, morphine was first isolated in 1806 as a natural product contained in opium.1

This drug has a wide variety of dosage forms and well-known pharmacokinetics. It is also generally available, and is reasonably priced.2 Today, morphine is the prototype to which all other natural and synthetic opioids are compared.

The bioavailability of morphine varies widely by its route of administration. The drug can be given orally, parenterally, rectally, sublingually, vaginally, epidurally, intrathecally, intraventricularly, and in a nebulized inhaler. Both immediate-release (IR) and slow-release formulations are available.

Morphine acts by binding to opioid receptors (thought to be located primarily in the central nervous system), which results in a diverse range of pharmacological effects, including:3

More recently, morphine has also been shown to produce local analgesic effects when administered peripherally such as in joints and wounds.4,5. Because of its impressive versatility and effectiveness, morphine is one of two opioids included in the model list of essential drugs for the treatment of cancer pain by the World Health Organization (WHO).6

In fact, the WHO uses morphine consumption as an index of improvement in pain management by individual countries.7

Morphine has no standard dose. As with all opioids, the amount of analgesia and the side effects produced by a particular dose vary by individual. And, as with most opioids, morphine has no analgesic ceiling so there is no maximum dose that can be administered. Dosages must be titrated over time to obtain optimal pain relief.

Morphine has two long-acting, active metabolites—morphine-3-glucuronide [M-3-G] and morphine-6-glucuronide [M-6-G]—that can accumulate and result in dose-limiting side effects, including somnolence (drowsiness), delirium, hyperalgesia (excessive sensitivity to pain), and myoclonus (sudden, involuntary contractions of skeletal muscles).8,9 Myoclonus can be a particular problem in the elderly and patients with renal insufficiency, who clear metabolites less efficiently than others.

Challenging Morphine Myths

Unwarranted fear of morphine addiction continues to greatly limit the efficacy and proper use of the drug. This fear is partly due to confusion and misconceptions about physical dependence, tolerance, and addiction.

The development of physical dependence is a normal physiologic response to chronic dosing of opioids. Abrupt cessation of the agent results in a drug-class-specific withdrawal syndrome.10 If morphine is abruptly discontinued after several weeks of regular use, patients experience an abstinence syndrome that includes rhinitis (inflammation of nasal passages), myalgia (muscular pain), abdominal cramping, and occasionally diarrhea. Withdrawal symptoms should not be confused with addiction and should always be avoided by gradually tapering doses when the opioid is no longer required.

Tolerance is a separate and succinct physiologic adaptation to a drug that results in a diminution of one or more of the drug’s effects over time.10 A patient who develops drug tolerance will require increasingly higher doses to achieve the same effect. Tolerance may occur to both opioid side effects (with the exception of constipation) and analgesia.

Tolerance to opioid side effects is both expected and desirable, since tolerance improves a patient’s ability to cope with long-term administration of the drug.11 However, tolerance to opioid side effects is highly variable among individuals and occurs at different rates for different side effects.11 Most predictably, patients receiving longterm opioid therapy develop a tolerance to respiratory depression.2

Tolerance to analgesia appears to be a problem for only a small group of patients and can often be dealt with by simply increasing the dose or switching to another opioid. At times, the need for an increased dosage is erroneously labeled tolerance when the need is, in fact, a result of disease progression, new disease, increased physical activity, lack of compliance, change in medication, addiction, and/or drug interactions (a pseudotolerance).12

Addiction is a complex phenomena that involves genetic and biopsychosocial factors. Unfortunately, symptoms of physical dependence and tolerance are often confused with addiction, but neither one constitutes addiction. Although morphine and other opioids are subject to addiction, no evidence exists, in the 200 plus years of its medical use, to suggest that morphine creates an addiction when used to treat pain.

Clinicians, patients, and families need to understand that the proper use of morphine—even at heroic doses and for prolonged periods of time—does not produce changes in the brain that confer vulnerability to subsequent drug abuse (addiction).13 Health care professionals and patients should know that such fears are scientifically groundless and impede the proper and humane treatment of pain.

Although the incidence of addiction disorders in patients with cancer is unknown, clinicians are much more likely to see situations of pseudoaddiction, a term used to describe patient behavior that looks like addiction but is really the result of undertreatment or anxiety related to undertreatment.14 Patients with pseudoaddiction exhibit “drug-seeking” behavior, often becoming obsessed with obtaining and taking the opioid.

Opioids play a crucial role in pain management, and their use in the treatment of chronic cancer pain continues to grow.15 Even with this increase in opioid use, patients with cancer continue to be undertreated for chronic pain.

Misunderstandings about morphine phenomena continue to inhibit the optimal use of morphine and other opioid analgesics. For more information about morphine and management of cancer pain, see http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/canpainsum/htm.

Debra B. Gordon, R.N., M.S., is senior clinical nurse specialist in pain management at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics in Madison, Wisc.

References:

  1. Weissman DE, Dahl J, Joranson DW. Oral morphine for the treatment of
    cancer pain. Princ Pract Oncol Updates. 1990;4(6):1-8.
  2. Jacox A, Carr D, Payne R, et al. Management of Cancer Pain: Clinical
    Practice Guideline No. 9. Rockville, Md: US Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1994. AHCPR publication 94-0592.
  3. Kadian [package insert]. Raleigh, NC: Faulding Laboratories Inc;1999.
  4. Stein C. The control of pain in peripheral tissues by opioids. N Engl J Med. 1995; 332:1685-1690.
  5. Stein C, Yassouridis A. Peripheral morphine analgesia. Pain. 1997;71:119-121.
  6. The Use of Essential Drugs: Sixth Report of the WHO Expert Committee. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 850.
  7. World Health Organization. With a guide to opioid availability. Cancer Pain Relief. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996.
  8. Sjogren P, Jonsson T, Henrik NJ, et al. Hyperalgesia and myoclonus in terminal cancer patients treated with continuous intravenous morphine. Pain. 1993;55:93-97.
  9. Smith MT. Neuroexcitatory effects of morphine and hydromorphone: evidence implicating the 3-glucuronide metabolites. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2000;27(7):524-528.
  10. Consensus document from the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM), the American Pain Society (APS), and the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM). Definitions Related to the Use of Opioids for the Treatment of Pain. February 2001. Available at: www.ampainsoc.org. Accessed: June 30, 2002.
  11. Cleary J, Backonja M. Translating opioid tolerance research. APS Bulletin. 1996;6(2):4-7.
  12. Brushwood DB, Finley R, Giglio JG, et al. Pharmacists responsibilities in management of opioids: a resource. American Pharmaceutical Association (AphA) Special Report, 2002.
  13. Dole VP, Gardner E, Kreek MJ, et al. Issues in chemical dependency. The 2nd Congress on Pain and Chemical Dependency, Keynote Abstract. January 15-17, 1998; 21.
  14. Weissman DE, Haddox JD. Opioid pseudoaddiction: an iatrogenic syndrome. Pain. 1989;36:363-366.
  15. American Pain Society. Principles of Analgesic Use in the Treatment of Acute Pain and Cancer Pain. 3rd ed. Glenview, Ill; 1992.
  16. Cleeland CS, Gonin R, Stewart JA, et al. Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330:592-596.

 

 

upback to top

 

Tuesday, January 06, 2009

ql

Last updated:1/6/2009